The court held that when a party brings an antislapp motion to dismiss, the nonmoving party can defeat the motion by showing that its claim was not brought primarily to chill the moving partys petitioning activity. Strategic lawsuits against public participation colorado. Last years key california antislapp decisions law360. In 2016, the california supreme court and the ninth circuit court of appeals issued important opinions interpreting californias antistrategic lawsuit against public participation statute c. The antistrategic lawsuit against public participation slapp statutes definitional focus is not the form of the plaintiffs cause of action but, rather, the defendants activity that gives rise to his or her asserted liabilityand whether that. Californias litigation privilege and californias antistrategic lawsuit against public participation antislapp statute. In recent years, dozens of states have enacted antistrategic lawsuits against public participation slapp laws to counter slapp suits, or lawsuits filed to silence a defendant who has spoken out.
In oregon, the idea for an antislapp statute originated with the citizen involvement advisory committee to the department of land. What is a strategic lawsuit against public participation slapp. The british columbia experience michaelin scott and chris tollefson in 2001, the province of british columbia bc became the first canadian jurisdiction to enact antislapp legislation. Slapp suits strategic litigation against public participation are typically claims for defamation, intentional infliction of emotional distress, invasion of privacy, or tortious interference with contract filed against a party who has criticized or spoken out against the plaintiff in some public context. Sarver contended that will james, the hurt lockers main character, was based on his life and experiences when. Superior court of the city and county of san francisco, no.
Abstrak antistrategic lawsuit against public participation antislapp telah diatur dalam pasal 66 undangundang nomor 32 tahun 2009. Canada has a much more limited experience with antislapp legislation. The texas citizens participation act1 is an acrosstheboard gamechanger in texas civil litigation,2 creating a sweeping dismissal mechanism that extends far beyond the traditional antistrategic lawsuits against public participation realm of protecting first amendment rights. Strategic lawsuits against public participation, also known as slapp suits, ordinarily arise out of defamation lawsuits. The act establishes an expedited process for a court to follow in a civil action in which a defendant files a motion to dismiss based upon the fact that the defendant was exercising the defendants constitutional right to petition the government or of free speech. Antistrategic lawsuit against public participation slapp. Banyaknya kasus pelanggaran hak partisipasi masyarakat untuk mendapatkan lingkungan hidup yang baik dan sehat membuat pemerintah berkomitmen untuk menyusun aturan pelaksana dari pasal 66 undangundang nomor 32 tahun 2009. This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by minn.
The snapchat user who allegedly slammed into a motorist at 100 mph will not be able to sue her victims lawyer for defamation. Anti strategic lawsuit against public participation motions to dismiss appeal. The defendants moved to dismiss under nevadas antistrategic lawsuit against public participation antislapp statute. He says many lawsuits are designed simply to intimidate. What is a strategic lawsuit against public participation. Such lawsuits, called strategic lawsuits against public participation or slapps, are typically dismissed as groundless or unconstitutional, but often not before the defendants are put to great expense, harassment, and interruption of their productive activities.
Bikkina filed an opposition to the motion to strike, arguing mahadevans statements were not made in a public forum and did not concern matters of. The public participation act institute for free speech. Strategic lawsuits against public participation a win. A complaint by tenants against their landlord alleged wrongful eviction in violation of a rent ordinance, negligence. Agenda ontarios new antistrategic lawsuit against public participation slapp legislation freedom of expressionbarring from municipal facilities fees and charges. In the united states district court plaintiff, civil no. Theyre called slapp lawsuits for strategic lawsuit against public participation. The trial court struck the complaint under the antistrategic lawsuit against public participation slapp statute code civ. A san mateo county superior court ruled in favor of social media giant facebook in an appeal brought against the companys antistrategic lawsuit against public participation antislapp motion as well as to strike the original complaint and award the company its attorneys fees for the appeal. Responding to strategic lawsuits against public participation slapps slapp stands for strategic lawsuit against public participation. California state antislapp public participation project. A strategic lawsuit against public participation slapp is a lawsuit that is intended to censor, intimidate, and silence critics by burdening them with the cost of a legal defense until they abandon their criticism or opposition.
Massachusetts highest appellate court on monday gave a group of nurses the green light to sue a hospital for defamation based on public statements by its president, saying the suit squares with a. Brinkeman also does not rule on an antislapp motion filed by halperdefendants at same time as the dismiss motion anti strategic lawsuit against public participation, designed to protect 1a expression from lawsuits. Thereafter, the author has suggested the need for antislapp legislation and has also provided guidelines for formulation of the same. This article was presented at strategic lawsuits against public participation. Such lawsuits have been made illegal in many jurisdictions on the grounds that they impede freedom of speech. A strategic lawsuit against public participation slapp is a lawsuit that is intended to censor. Strategic lawsuits against public participation a win for freedom of expression. Dombind libel suit public interest advocacy centre. Second, under the new jersey product liability act, actions for defective products may be asserted only against. You might be slapped for actions such as posting a blog entry, posting a comment on another persons blog. Defamation is a common law tort whereby one citizen can sue another citizen for damage to reputation. Strategic litigation against public participation slapp has been defined as a lawsuit started against one or more people or groups who speak out or take a position on an issue of public interest. First, they are certainly not labeled by filers as antipetition clause ac.
Strategic lawsuit against public participation wikipedia. Nevadas antislapp statute takes aim at strategic lawsuits against public participation, or slapps, which abuse the judicial process by chilling, intimidating. The panel affirmed the district courts denial of robert hirshs special motion under the california antistrategic lawsuit against public participation antislapp statute, cal. Massachusetts courts issue key decisions concerning. Antislapp laws do not diminish the ability of plaintiffs to bring lawsuits for legitimate. Claim arising from persons exercise of constitutional right of petition or free speechspecial motion to strike. Kendrick also moved for partial judgment on the pleadings based on the statute of limitations, 14 m. Merumuskan peraturan anti strategic lawsuit against public participation di indonesia formulate anti strategic lawsuit against public participation in indonesia raynaldo sembiring abstrak a nti strategic lawsuit against public participation antislapp telah diatur dalam pasal 66 undangundang nomor 32 tahun 2009. Alex brakefield associate dallas, tx attorney husch. It refers to a lawsuit filed in retaliation for speaking out on a public issue or controversy. The antistrategic lawsuit against public participation slapp statute does not apply to claims of attorney malpractice, even though the petitioning activity is part of the evidentiary landscape within which the claims arise, since the gravamen of the claims is that the former attorney engaged in nonpetitioning activity inconsistent. While this legislation proved to be short lived, the bc experience around the issue of slapps is.
Zuckerberg and facebook then sued argentieri for malicious prosecution and sent a message to the press, stating that argentieri knew the suit was based on forged documents. We reverse, holding that the trial court erred in ruling that townsend was not entitled to dismissal of the counterclaims as. Studying strategic lawsuits against public participation. Slapps are strategic lawsuits against public participation. The legislature finds and declares that it is in the public interest to encourage continued participation in matters of public significance, and that this participation should not be chilled through abuse of the judicial process. A brief overview of antislapp statutes brooks pierce. Strategic lawsuits against public participation environmental law. District of columbias antistrategic lawsuit against public participation antislapp statute precludes liability arising from advocacy on issues of public interest. Alex brakefield is an associate in our dallas, tx office practicing commercial litigation with experience in general assignment.
Overview experience case studies thought leadership. Strategic lawsuits against public participation, slapps and were first. Antislapp advisory panel ministry of the attorney general. Were seeing a rise in individuals being sued for speaking out online, said evan mascagni, who works for the public participation project. Section i of this paper will discuss what is an antistrategic lawsuit against public participation motion to strike and the legislative history behind it. The united states and california constitutions grant every person petition and free speech rights to participate in government and civic affairs, speak freely on public issues and issues of public interest, and petition government officials for redress of grievances. The purpose of a slapp is to silence critics by redirecting their energy and finances into defending a lawsuit and away from their original public criticism. Municipal case law update northwestern ontario municipal association jody e.
Oregons antistrategic lawsuit against public participation slapp statute, or. Obtained a court order dismissing an employees claims for fraud and negligent misrepresentations with the use of a special motion to strikeanti strategic lawsuit against public participation slapp motion after the employee was unsuccessful in obtaining a judgment for wrongful termination against the employer and sought to prosecute new. Antistrategic lawsuit against public participation act, or the d. A cause of action against a person arising from any act of that person in. Through the use of californias antislapp statute, courts are now armed to enforce the proposition that malicious prosecution actions are. The georgia court of appeals last week used an antistrategic lawsuit against public participation antislapp law to toss a. Section ii will examine the application of antislapp motions to early cases, and then note how that application evolved in later cases. Common antislapp laws include measures such as penalties for plaintiffs who file lawsuits ruled frivolous and special. Antislapp act, to address an increase in lawsuits filed by one side of a political or public policy debate aimed to punish or prevent the expression of opposing points of view. These damaging suits chill free speech and healthy debate by targeting those who communicate with their government or speak out on issues of public interest. Mahadevan asserted that his statements concerned important public issues and constituted protected speech.
524 1403 1213 1036 1374 871 55 675 519 1021 930 851 790 475 1211 1457 362 1343 1129 1195 287 1508 898 666 305 1032 1085 1344 351 1070 1280 739 68 712 1010 1103 600 157 1102 982 743 1318 173 1062 213 1324 1433 542 457